{"id":51417,"date":"2026-07-30T10:05:26","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T08:05:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/badania.uew.pl\/?p=51417"},"modified":"2026-07-30T10:07:37","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T08:07:37","slug":"video-games-are-more-than-entertainment-wueb-researchers-on-cooperation-between-game-developers-and-the-cultural-and-creative-industries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/badania.uew.pl\/en\/video-games-are-more-than-entertainment-wueb-researchers-on-cooperation-between-game-developers-and-the-cultural-and-creative-industries\/","title":{"rendered":"Video games are more than entertainment. WUEB researchers on cooperation between game developers and the cultural and creative industries"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n

The cultural and creative industries are regarded as the core of the modern economy, and the Video Game Industry Ecosystem (VGIE) plays a leading role among them, combining advanced technological solutions with the production of cultural content. An interdisciplinary team from Wroclaw University of Economics and Business has examined what sets this cooperation in motion, what blocks it, and which mechanisms shape the way it unfolds. The article has appeared in Games and Culture<\/em>, a journal placed in the highest scoring band on the Polish ministerial list (200 points).\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

\"Obrazek<\/figure>\n\n\n

The publication sets out in detail what motivates game developers and cultural institutions to work together, the barriers they encounter, and which coordination mechanisms determine the success of joint projects.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Innovation grows out of cooperative relationships: four drivers of cooperation<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Combining a systematic literature review with an expert group interview, the researchers identified four principal drivers of cooperation within the video game ecosystem:\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Financial support.<\/strong> Public grants and tax reliefs are central to getting joint projects off the ground.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. Access to talent.<\/strong> Game development needs, for instance, artistic competences or historical knowledge that cannot be built inside a production team alone.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. The complexity of games.<\/strong> Modern productions call for multidimensional innovation, achievable only through co-creation.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. Care for heritage.<\/strong> A wish to protect and revitalise culture through modern, engaging digital media.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Proximity that builds value<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The study shows that effective cooperation requires not only capital but, above all, proximity mechanisms. The researchers confirmed the earlier findings of Boschma (2005), which point to the key role of five value-building proximity dimensions: cognitive (convergence of technologies and competences), social (trust and social relationships), organisational (similar working cultures), institutional (shared norms and values) and geographical, including temporal (shared events and trade fairs).  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Proximity concept: Boschma R. (2005), Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment, \u201cRegional Studies\u201d, 39(1), pp. 61-74. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    \u201cThe most effective projects rest on solid relationships that combine trust, a shared vision and care for the good of the audience\u201d<\/em><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \u2014 the study participants emphasise.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

    Legal anchors and mental barriers<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    Despite the considerable potential of such cross-industry cooperation, the WUEB researchers point to significant barriers holding it back. Among the most serious are outdated legal regulations, which have not kept pace with the dynamics of the digital market. The experts also point to silo thinking and to a lack of understanding of what is specific about games among public decision-makers, who at times still treat the area as marginal. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    A further problem is the language barrier, and here the issue is not English but industry jargon. Game developers and representatives of cultural institutions and other creative industries often speak ‘different languages\u2019, which makes it harder to define shared objectives and project scope with any precision. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The authors give particular attention to a stage that has been almost entirely overlooked in academic literature: the ending phase of cooperation, meaning what happens to a partnership as it winds down or moves into dormancy. The distinction matters: a dormant partnership is not a broken one – it can be reactivated for a later project, if trust and a shared language were built earlier on. The two strands of the study converge on a single point. A contemporary video game is at once a sophisticated technological product and a digital artefact of culture, so neither industry can build its value alone. The authors therefore treat breaking out of industry \u201csilo thinking\u201d as one of the conditions of effective cross-industry cooperation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The GAMEHEARTS project and Horizon Europe<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

    The research was carried out within the international GAMEHEARTS project (Games, Heritage, Arts, & Sport: the economic, social, and cultural value of the European videogame ecosystem)<\/a>, funded by the European Union under Horizon Europe (Grant Agreement No. 101132543, call HORIZON-CL2-2023-HERITAGE-01-06). The project examines the economic and cultural value of the European video game industry ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n

    ABOUT THE AUTHORS<\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    All five researchers named below are co-authors of the article. The team brings together strategic management, inter-organisational cooperation, information science, international human resource management, and process design and facilitation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n